October 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
Sep   Nov

Previous / Next

 3/6/05
 3/6/05
 3/6/05
 3/6/05
 3/5/05
 3/5/05
 3/5/05
 3/3/05
 3/3/05
 3/3/05
 3/3/05

Thursday, October 14, 2004


Spaceship,New York

Alien Cockpit

The trouble with the museum trips, is that I never seem to pay any interest in the exhibits.  The floor on the fourth floor made me think of some alien runway.  Behind me, are all the dinosour skeletons that so intrigued me as a kid.  But now, going back, there were too many wires; too much artifice for me to really enjoy myself.  I have a similar problem with opera.  This is a terrible loss since I know I'm missing so much - but I wander around, just looking at lines, windows, reflections, lamps.  I wonder, why did they decide to place that light over there?  So much glare on the poor T-Rex.  At any rate - this shot gave me that old Buck Rogers on acid feeling.

10:14:31 PM    


Dinasours,New York

Dancing Dinosours & Skyline
Museum of Natural History

It looked to me like they were doing a modern dance.  The skyline is through a window reflected in the glass display.

5:12:00 PM    


Taxi Eyes,New York

Taxi Eyes

I seem to be working on a series of cab driver's in the rear view mirror.  What a great hat he had on.  I should have used a wider lens but it all happened a bit fast.

5:02:16 PM    

Digital Notes:

1. Yes, RAW mode is better.  Even, when the image is being converted to a 16 bit grayscale.  It is especially important if the exposure wasn't right on, and in the transitions from one tone to another.  This is after doing a lot of printing yesterday, trying to decide which image to select to go larger with.  What I've been doing is  making tests of an image that I want to go big with by cropping one or two sections to print on letter size paper.

2. I'm almost settled on a workflow and a "look" for the images.  I have one "gray" profile for the Photorag and one for the EE Matte.  In ImagePrint you can slightly (very subtle) give the print a warmer or colder tone and I like the slightly warmer look better.  I think most people will hardly notice it and see it as neutral photo-realistic look - but it is there if you hold two prints side by side. 

3. The biggest difference between darkroom and digital printing for me - is that instead of dreading having to go through the whole routine of mixing chemicals, setup, drying et. al. (I know some people love this process) involved with the darkroom, I actually look forward to printing something new on the 2200.  I  have three new prints that look great on the PhotoRag, but I'm still deciding what size is best for them.

4. One other boon / bane is that the amount of control you have is incredible.  If you tend towards the obsessive perfectionist, this can be overwhelming.  I've been working on the Marsh print (Turtle Pond in the smoke of canon fire); and there were always a couple of things that annoyed me about the print, such as this small black rock and some dodging / burning things that were beyond me.  I thought, since this print has a sort of Japanese watercolor feel to it, it would be perfect for the photorag paper, which it is.  But I spent several hours changing tones in some very small portions of the print.  The right corner (which I had cropped from the original print because it was problematic - is back in).  The little black rock has been moved up a couple of zones.  Part of the sky which was a pure white in the original print, has been brought down two zones or so.  I think this will be the first one I'll do large.  (Originally shot on Plus-X.)

12:06:57 PM    


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2005 Dave Beckerman.
Last update: 3/7/2005; 11:53:56 AM. Click to see xml version of photo blog